Founding Mothers and the Stamp Act by J. V.
- In the 1760's women were not allowed to own land, they did not have
the benefit of a formal education, women were not able to read or write,
and often they were believed to lack basic knowledge to make informed
decisions about politics and economics, but when it came to the American
resistance movements and the boycotts of the 1760's and the 1770's
women were proven to be anything but quiet and nice. In yesterday's
assignment, we were set to watch a video about a speech Dr. Rosamarie
Zagarri gave at the University of Oklahoma. In this speech, she
mentioned four main women known to have changed and shaped the ways of
history, these women were: Ester Debert Reed, Phyllis Wheatley,
Elizabeth Alexander Stevens, and Hannah Leigh Corbin. As mentioned in
her speech, "the boycotts depended on the support of the people, they
needed the support of the primary consumers in the colonies, [they
needed the support of the] women." During that era, even though women
were unknowledgeable in politics, they held an enormous power, they held
social and economic power. It was the support of the female "shopper"
whom the men counted on for the boycotts to be successful, and
successful they were. In 1780 Ester Debert Reed, wrote letters called
"The sentiments of an American woman," to call to other woman in other
colonies to help support our troops. She would go door to door asking
for donations of any kind. Phyllis Wheatley, helped bring resistance to
slavery, people soon saw that black people were capable of much more
than what they were credited for. Phyllis believed that the rhetorics of
the American Revolution also applied to the slaves, to the black
people. Elizabeth Alexander Stevens, was a woman who owned property and
paid taxes. After her, it became a law that only woman who were single,
widowed or unmarried, could own land, and only those who owned a certain
amount of land could vote or hold public office, including women.
Rosamarie's main argument in this speech is to let her listeners know
that women also helped shape the ways of this nation. That women started
to have a voice and right before the American revolution and that they
were a big part of the resistance. She argues that women should be
considered founders just as men.
- The authors purpose was for her listeners to be able to understand
the role women had in the years before and after the American
Revolution. The voice that I would have liked to hear in this speech
would have been Ester Reeds. According to Rosamarie, Ester lived through
the times the colonies formed the boycotts and was there supporting the
resistance or the "cause" as it was called then, it would have given
me pleasure to hear her story and the accounts she had of her years
during that time. We all know facts and hear stories through other
people and what they have heard or read but it is always more memorable
to hear it directly from a person who lived through an experience. In
this case, it would have been memorable to hear directly from Ester how
her life was during this era and the experiences she went through
firsthand. The primary voice that was heard was Rosamarie, as woman, as a
historian, it was her knowledge on the subject that we heard.
- When an assignment is given to us, whether it is a reading, or a
speech to listen to, we are often left with questions, or
misunderstandings that often need clarification. In yesterday's class
discussion, our group talks and questions answered by the professor
enhance our understanding of this topic. In our own groups, we ask each
other questions and we tried to help each other get a better
understanding on the subject based on our own views and understanding,
or we just fill in the gaps, maybe there was something one of us heard
that the other did not pay attention to. We then ask these same
questions to the professor and she truly gives us the insight and
responses we need to fully understand the subject. For example, she gave
us a better understating of the New York Merchants Non-Importation
Agreement, most of us believed that this agreement was just to not allow
merchants of the colonies to import goods from the English as a
boycott. That the colonists were not allowed to import and the orders
already being received just be sent back until the Stamp Act be
repealed. When, what the colonist wanted to do was to hurt the English
colonies and make the English merchants hurt so they (as in the
Englishmen) could go back to Parliament and say, "œhey whatever you are
doing you need to stop."
- Some historical questions that were discussed in class were: what
did women do before the American Revolution to help and support the
resistance? What did the women do during and after the American
revolution to help and support the resistance? We also received
clarification and further information about the resolutions of the Stamp
Act and the Non-Importation agreement of New York. In class, this is
some of the conclusions we drew up from the Founding Mothers speech by
Rosamarie Zagarri. In the 1760's before the revolution, women stopped
buying imported cloth and started home spinning their own, in often
cases they even held what were then called, "patriotic spinning bees,"
where all the women of the colony got together and homespun the cloths.
Women formed groups, called the Daughters of Liberty, as female
counterparts to the Sons of Liberty. As soon as men were called away
into the war, the wives had to not only take care of the home but now
they were left with the responsibility of the farm, the businesses, the
family, and if they had any, the slaves and servants. Some followed
their husbands to the war and others would either sell items to troops
of do deeds for them in support. Some of these deeds could have included
washing clothes for them and cooking. In the years that came after the
American revolution woman like Phyllis Wheatley and Elizabeth Stevens
helped form a new revolution on woman's rights. Phyllis also helped help
blacks and slaves see they too have as much potential and they too
deserve equality, liberty, and rights. When is can to the resolutions of
the Stamp Act, we concluded, that the colonies wanted to also have say
in these acts, they wanted to enjoy their rights and liberty. In other
words, colonists wanted to also have a say in government not just have
to obey the laws of parliament. And lastly, we concluded that the
non-importation agreement of 1765 was to hurt the merchants of the
English colonies to they, could add pressure to parliament.
- Some of the questions that are left lurking in my head are: 1. Even
though women did help with the resistance movements why then did it
still take a long time for women to be able to have equal rights, were
they afraid to remain fighting? And 2. When did Parliament lose power
and gave in to what the colonist wanted all along? When did they listen
to the cries of the people?